Talking about evolution - blog by Gurdur

 




A blog of random jottings on events, science, renfairs, travel, reading, music, humanism, religion, atheism, and even the odd spot of gardening.

Rate this Entry
Talking about evolution
Submit "Talking about evolution" to Digg Submit "Talking about evolution" to del.icio.us Submit "Talking about evolution" to StumbleUpon Submit "Talking about evolution" to Google
Posted 10-Apr-2015 at 01:09 AM (01:09) by Gurdur

Evolution happens, but it's not a simple thing at all, and it's often burdened with projection and myths by people with agendas. Evolution only really gets interesting once we talk about complex things; and those things are the hardest to explain, of course. One of the most comon agendas driving myths about evolution is based on the myth that simple answers can be given off-the-cuff to complex questions, which is of course wrong. One book that really helped me begin understanding evolution is a book not about genetics: "The Recursive Universe: Cosmic Complexity and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge", by William Poundstone. This discusses how to research complex things from 'simple' foundations, a necessity for truly understanding evolution. If you think this is automatically easy to understand, you're very wrong; pick up a copy of "Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues", by by J. A. Cover, Martin Curd and Christopher Pincock, to find out just how thorny, complex and difficult - and occasionally insoluble - many philosophical problems inside science in general are. The philosophy is essential - science gives us a lot of what to think about, but it's philosophy that gives us how to think. Including logic - logic comes from philosophy, not science.

It is very important not to burden evolution with agenda-driven tribal politics. Evolution is not incompatible with religion per se; for example, most British Christians accept evolution, and in 2011 over 500 Christian church parishes throughout the USA celebrated Darwin Day. It is equally important to realize that just saying "evolution" is not an explanation by itself; you have to describe the process and mechanisms plausibly. One of the most common mistakes, made both by scientists and non-scientists, is to unconsciously think that because evolution is a process, it is defined by its end. You see the mistake come up time and time again; it's called the teleological fallacy, the belief that evolution does A, so it has the purpose to get to A. For example, saying that brains evolved to help us talk better, or saying birds evolved because flying is an advantage. Evolution has no purpose; it simply is. Eventually, bacteria evolve into humans - but bacteria remain existing alongside humans. The tree hyrax is related to hippos and elephants, but doesn't look or act like either. Evolution has no mind nor intent of its own - but we evolved with minds and intent. As soon as someone starts, "The reason X evolved is...", they've almost always gone wrong; evolution does not proceed to a goal.

Another good book that really helped me understand evolution is "The Selfish Gene", by Richard Dawkins. While the science in the book is a little dated, and many debates rage on as to mechanisms of evolutionary processes and drives, the book remains a classic, and is brilliant at explaining some issues. Where Dawkins goes wrong is usually on the extended philosophy, and that does not affect this book - I recommend it wholeheartedly, even though there are omissions, and things in it to disagree with.

Debates within biology and wider science rage on as to the exact mechanisms and processes of evolution. Natural selection, adaptation versus sexual selection, gene selection versus kin selection versus group selection, genes versus epigenetics, all these debates and many more rage on within science. We don't have anywhere near all the answers, we're just struggling forward to get real answers as we can. It's essential we do so.


Darwin's desk:




Statue of Darwin in the Natural History Museum, London - draped in a knitted squid:





Link to much bigger version of the graphic below:



         Pin It         


                  

divider line


Comments are welcome! Please keep in mind if you are not registered that comments posted here to this blog post may take a while to appear - up to 16 hours after you post them, since they go onto a moderation queue and have to be individually approved, in order to stop spammers. The answer to the so-called "Random Question" is always "human", with no quote marks. Please give your name or pseudonym in the Comment box provided; failure to give a name or pseudonym can mean that in the case of abuse or empty flames I will be even less likely to allow the comment to be shown. I also like to know with whom I'm talking. A name or pseudonym is not essential; but it does help.






Posted in Uncategorized
Views 9416 Comments 0
Total Comments 0

Comments

                   Post a Comment   Post a Comment
Post a Comment Post a Comment
Total Trackbacks 0

Trackbacks


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:42 AM (06:42).

       

Credits and thanks:
Basic Style design: Design By: Miner Skinz.com
(much altered by Gurdur)

For smilies:

Koloboks, including Aiwan, ViShenk, Just Cuz, Laie, Connie, snoozer, Viannen,
and especially Mother Goose too.
KitKatty. and PederDingo, and phantompanther.

For help, coding, and/or modifications:

Different people at vBulletin.com, and a whole lot of people -- too many to be individually named, sorry -- at vBulletin.org

For artwork, avatars, backgrounds and so on:

KitKatty, and verte, and britpoplass


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright is asserted for the Heathen Hub itself and for its owner by its owner, from 2008 onwards. Copyright of individual posts remains the property of the original poster, however by posting on the Hub the poster grants the Hub the rights to host and present the posted messages for perpetuity. The Hub is in no way responsible for opinions or messages posted in any way on the Hub by its members. Please also see this here. Copyright of individual icons and other graphics, as for individual vBulletin styles, remains the property of the original owner/creator. Copyright for the vBulletin software itself, and the vBulletin Blogs software, remains with Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd, as in the copyright notice above.
Welcome to a place to talk about atheism, religion, science, humanism, evolution, politics, Creationism, literature, reason, rational inquiry, logic, cooking, reading, and travel - the Hub: a community for everyone.